Sunday, October 30, 2011

What if Auburn and Alabama Go East?

The craziness of college conference expansion continues to make for some awful geography. To borrow from Jack Arute, I don't know much about the University of Missouri, but I do know that Missouri is not in the South and it's not in the East. But once upon a time, Fayetteville, Arkansas seemed more West than South. That all changed for me when I visited FayetteNam for a Tennessee game and saw grown men and woman calling the Hogs. I mean, if that's not southern, I don't know what is. And of course, South Carolina is (a) in the South and (b) 100% redneck, so that was an easy fit when the league added those two teams in 1992. I actually think Texas A & M is a nice addition and any school that was smart enough to start a tradition of kissing your girlfriend (or wife) after your team scores is good by me. By the way, do they do this at basketball games? If so, that would be awesome!

I'm not sure what they do at Mizzou and I have a hard time getting why this move made sense versus other options such as Clemson, Virgina Tech, Florida State or even West Virgina (which is now in the Big 12... some 800+ miles from its closest new rival!). I know TV households and all that matter, but isn't the SEC making pretty good money already? Well, if it must be Missouri, then let's at least not screw up the true SEC rivalries. No, Missouri cannot be placed in the East Division... that will truly be a joke. And I'm not convinced that just Auburn will move to the East because of what that would do to the football schedule. As SEC fans know, each SEC school has one permanent rival that it plays every year from the other division. If you move Auburn to the East, then Bama would be their annual West rival. So what's the problem? Well, Tennessee and Alabama have played their annual slugfest since 1901, and unlike Auburn-Alabama, they've never stopped (well, except in 1943 due to World War II). So, we must keep this game going and that creates a problem. Perhaps the SEC will play two more conference games a year, which would be great for the fans and probably be better for TV. However, that's not going to be popular with the Coaches since they like to have 2 or 3 games against Sister of Mercy-type teams. The new format will probably be a total of eight SEC games for each team with six games in your division, a rotation through the opposite division (they'll do a two year home and home series with one team) and one permanent interdivisional opponent. With that in mind, I started looking at the map and the teams and while not ideal, I think there's something to shifting both Alabama and Auburn to the East and Vandy moves West. This would allow the key rivalry games to stay intact. Here's how it'd shake out (the teams are listed so that their permanent interdivisional opponent is opposite them... example, Alabama vs. Texas A&M is the permanent rivalry game):

EAST

Alabama
Auburn
Tennessee
South Carolina
Georgia
Florida
Kentucky
WEST

Texas A&M
LSU
Missouri
Arkansas
Mississippi State
Ole Miss
Vanderbilt


With this division setup, Alabama and Auburn remain divisional rivals and Bama can keep its Third Saturday in October date each year with the Vols. Georgia-Auburn keeps going, as does Auburn-LSU. The basic geography makes sense and the annual opposite division games would set up nicely. Of course, some annual games we've come to enjoy are going to go to an every seven year rotation, but there's no way to avoid that change no matter how the divisions are set up. So let's move two team eastward in the new SEC and keep producing great games and special rivalries. Now if we can just work on a reduction in the amount of teams using Tigers as their mascot!

Wednesday, November 24, 2010

What if Auburn said "No"?

As a life long SEC Football fan, I've seen plenty of controversy, heard more rumors of dollars going to players and have little doubt that through the years boosters have given gifts, jobs and money to athletes and their families. Sometimes it feels as if the major programs are truly unable to stem the tide of influence that boosters are more than willing to try to peddle. What 18-year-old kid, especially one who's grown up without much more than the football jersey on his back, wouldn't be tempted by the cash? $100 handshakes and deep discounts for everything from meals to cars has been a part of the college football landscape for decades. We know it goes on and we try to forgot that Bobby Booster just can't help himself by feeding the beast because Super Ego Bobby wants to think he helped land The Player that got them to the Championship. This year started with a former Heisman winner shipping his trophy back to The Downtown Athletic Club. Now it looks like the leading candidate for this year's award, which is the ultimate individual trophy in college athletics, will be "a person of interest" as the cops like to say. Cameron Newton is his name and the full story is still not known. Did he or his Father seek cash to sign with a school? If it was all his Dad's doing, did Cam Newton know? And what does it mean if he didn't? These are the questions currently swirling around the college football scene. But I got to wondering about another question... one I hadn't heard the pundits talking about. What if the Big Boosters did say "no?" What if the scandal and the probations and the stripping of wins and championships has finally gotten boosters thinking "I'm not doing that" when someone puts their hand out? Could it be? Have we moved into a new era in college athletics? Wouldn't that be something. And maybe, just maybe, it's true.

Cam Newton, with the size, the sizzling arm and graceful moves, is a once-in-a-generation football player. A guy so majestic that you just can't describe how awesome he really is or how easily he blows by linebackers and safeties. A thousand watt smile and plenty of charisma, this out of nowhere, return to grace epic of Cam Newton was by far the most compelling story in all of college football this year. I attended the instant classic Arkansas versus Auburn game with a bunch of Auburn old-timers (sorry guys... but if you were there for the '57 Championship, you are indeed, old timers). These men would come close to tears as they spoke of their newest gridiron hero... the boy-man who was turning Auburn from a nice little team (Citrus Bowl would be good) to BCS contender (I'm making reservations in Glendale). And make no mistake about it, Newton is a huge difference maker. Auburn losses 3-5 games without him, I am certain. But then that stupid ESPN scrolls across your screen and your heart sinks.

"Reports out of Mississippi indicate that a man claiming to represent Cam Newton's father sought $200,000 for Newton to sign with Mississippi." Now I will say this... I'm not sure I'd take $200K to live in Starkville. There are better places to play ball, I assure you. No matter, the asking price was out there and it looks like it's more than a rumor at this point. There's little question in my mind that Daddy was looking for some green before he would let Cam sign the letter of intent. But the buzz that Cam told recruiters at Mississippi that the money was just too good to pass up at Auburn appears to be bunk. And perhaps, the stories of Cecil Newton seeking $180,000 (in three easyplan installments) may be a fabrication, too. But what if Cecil Newton went looking for a deal and got nowhere? Could it be that the folks at Mississippi and Auburn said "No" to the pay-to-play request? Maybe that's why nothing else has surfaced? Perhaps no one can follow the money because there is no money to track?

I sure hope Cam Newton did nothing wrong. I hope his father never asked for anything. And if Pops was seeking some extra benefits, I hope his son had no idea. Perhaps, the NCAA will rule that Cam Newton was not aware of his Dad's efforts but still must be punished for the deeds of his father. Maybe Cam Newton will be suspended for the Alabama game and the SEC Championship. Former QB turned Wide Receiver Cody Burns steps in and leads the Tigers to two more victories and into the BCS Championship Game. Cam Newton shows up in Glendale, apologizes for the sins of his family and then leads the Tigers to their first National Championship in over 50 years. That wouldn't be a bad ending to a situation that looks mighty bleak right now.

Of course, the NCAA will take months to ponder the evidence. They'll come in with a finding of fact and levy a severe blow to poor Auburn University. If there's a Championship won, it will probably be vacated. Another sad story of short-sighted athletes taking the dough instead of recognizing the hero status they can obtain by being good citizens. Reggie Bush would have received a standing ovation and seen his name honored at USC for decades. Cam Newton or his father may have ended up forfeiting millions in endorsements once Cam turns pro. And if he is guilty, Cam will always be associated with a failure of character rather than an example of a fine collegiate athlete. Watching the great ones come back to their campuses for a game and seeing the emotions of their fans as they stroll through the crowd, you wonder what it must feel like to be etched in college football lore. The Bo Jacksons and Hershel Walkers... the Peyton Mannings and Desmond Howards... they come on campus and the fans go nuts. What a great feeling that must be. I hope Cam Newton doesn't miss out on that. I hope Mississippi fans and Auburn fans were smart enough to say no and save him from that shame. The Bible says "A good name is more desirable than great riches." Please, tell me Cam Newton still has a good name.